The US Copyright Office has confirmed that unless an author or artist contributes to the "creative process" of ...

Works created entirely by prompts and generative AI cannot be copyright protected • Works created by both humans and AI need to be determined on a case-by-case basis • The copyright of photographs was ...

Amid a churning AI market and increasing anxiety about the role of AI in the creation of works of art, the U.S. government has set a strong benchmark: If a human isn't involved, it's not worth legal ...

A work that combines human creativity with AI can be copyrighted, so long as there is a “sufficient” amount of human ...

OpenAI thinks DeepSeek may have used its AI outputs inappropriately, highlighting ongoing disputes over copyright, fair use, and training data.

The new guidelines say that AI prompts currently don’t offer enough control to “make users of an AI system the authors of the output.” (AI systems themselves can’t hold co ...

Microsoft is bringing OpenAI’s o1 reasoning model to all Copilot users this week. You won’t need to subscribe to a $20 ...

In the U.S., AI-generated creations — books, movies, and so forth— that have been edited by a human can likely be copyrighted, but those without any human ...

Movies and other complex works created through AI means cannot be copyrighted, except when these AI tools are used to further develop pre-existing content. The US ...

The report by the office could help allow the use of AI tools in films, music, books, and other creative fields.

Discover how copyright laws apply to AI-generated content and why human creativity remains essential for protection.